WARREN: Six, seven, eight, nine, ten; six, seven, eight, nine, ten.Let's see how we're doing now.
[Pause in recording.]
WARREN: As a starter, I wonder if you could tell me how you first gotinterested in, uh, the NAACP, in, uh, civil rights, the civil rights, uh, movement.
HENRY: Well, Reverend--Dr. Warren, rather, I believe it, it goes backto, uh, a point before I could even I guess remember myself. One of the earliest experiences that I remember was the traumatic experience of being separated from a lad that I had known since birth, when it came time to go to school. And we were living in the rural. I was born in this county. And his parents and my parents were the best of friends. 1:00And, of course, Randolph and I became inseparable. And to have to go to one school and he to another at the age of six or seven was one of the early crises of my life. And I just never forgot about it.
WARREN: This is a white boy, you mean?
HENRY: Yes, Randolph was a white boy. And I understand from my motherand from his mother that as children, as babies that they would leave him with my mother at times and me with him and his mother at times. And we both nursed each other's mother's breasts as children. And when it came time to, to go to school, we all looked forward to it. And here, the great experience that we anticipated was, uh, so negated by the question of racial prejudice and racial bias that separated two 2:00kids who loved each other dearly. And, since that time and I can't remember a time that, uh, I was not concerned about the race question and determined to do what I could about it.
WARREN: Of course, many people are aware of it. I suppose every negrohas to be aware if a good part (??) of the times but, uh, in doing is another thing. I mean actual moving into, uh, an organization like the NAACP or a similar organization. And you have been with it a long time, I understand.
HENRY: Yes, I became a member of NAACP as a high school student. Whenthe senior class of '41 in Coahoma County here, uh, were encouraged to take out membership in the NAACP. And, of course, after high school, going into the service there was an immediate need for NAACP philosophy 3:00with regard to the many instances of racial bigotry and racial prejudice we ran into in the service. And coming out of the service into college on the campus of Xavier University, there was a strong civil rights movement. Participating in the National Students Association as a student, uh, gave additional opportunity of participation with organizations that were concerned about the rights of mankind.
WARREN: This is after the war?
HENRY: This is after the war, yes, sir.
HENRY: And upon coming home from college in '50, we did not have anorganized NAACP in the community. And in '52, we organized the NAACP here, and I became its, uh, president and have remained president of the local branch ever since.
WARREN: I know you've been very prominent in it. In fact, so prominentthat I've heard that the bullet that, that Medgar Evers got might have 4:00gotten you, by a toss-up.
HENRY: Well, I've heard that, too. And we get it from what we considerusually reliable sources within the news media. But I'm not, uh, anxious to, to die, but I'm not afraid of it. I think one thing that the death of Medgar accomplished for me; it freed me from any fear of it. I know that I can never give any more to the cause than Medgar Evers gave. And he was the best friend I had. And I'm willing to give as much.
WARREN: This was, uh, a deep, personal friendship then?
HENRY: Yes, sir, it goes back to around '50. We both got out of schoolabout the same time.
WARREN: Were you in school together?
HENRY: No, we were in, in different institutions--
HENRY:--but we came out and began working in the freedom movementtogether.
WARREN: Was he a native Mississippian, same as you (??)?
HENRY: Yes, sir. He was from Newton County, Mississippi--
WARREN:--that's what I thought, but he was not from here.5:00
HENRY: No, he was, he was from Newton County; not from Coahoma County.
WARREN: Yes, I remember now.
HENRY: Yes, sir.
WARREN: There has been, uh, uh, threatening, and there has been, uh,small acts of violence against you, hasn't there here?
HENRY: Well, yes. Our house was bombed and set afire and shot into.And the store's been bombed.
WARREN: The store's been, uh--the windows knocked out, too, hasn't it?
HENRY: Yes, sir, the windows were knocked out pretty frequently.
WARREN: Pretty frequently, so I hear. Was it one case of shooting intothe house, or, or more?
HENRY: Uh, two.
HENRY: Yes, sir.
WARREN: I read about one. I, I think I've heard about one more, oneother, but I, I didn't know how much, there might have been some I hadn't heard about.
HENRY: Well, you see what happens, the, these things happen usually lateat night. And some wild, uh careen of cars come through and they shoot at random. Perhaps not aiming, but just shooting, a bullet could cause 6:00serious difficulty.
WARREN: Well, you're--bombing isn't quite that casual though.
HENRY: No, they, the time that they bombed the house here the house wewere all, uh, asleep. And we woke, the concussion awoke us--
HENRY: And of course the, uh, incendiary set, set the house afire, andwe were able to get the fire out, however, before any serious, serious damage was done to any of the people, any members of the family--
HENRY:--or any of the visitors who happened be here at that time.
WARREN: Do you think that was just a bomb to frighten you, to intimidateyou, or do you think it was meant to destroy the house? Destroy things (??)?
HENRY: I think it was meant to destroy us.
WARREN: Um-hm. Strong enough for that?
HENRY: Yes, sir.
WARREN: What about the criticism of NAACP by some of the otherorganizations? Or people--put it this way--not organizations as 7:00organizations, as I have encountered this here and there. You know they, the, the lines taken by various people, even--
WARREN:--well, I, I take this position that it's important really thatwe keep our eyes on the target, which is freedom, and I guess also on the enemy who would be considered those who are in opposition to all Americans or all citizens, uh, obtaining citizenship in America. Now, I take this position also, that in partisan conversation, there is bound to be at times a praising of a particular organization, and many times some people feel that the only way to praise their own is to down the other. In the main, however, I think that those of us 8:00who are genuinely concerned with civil rights, in speaking sometimes derogatorily about the NAACP, uh, are not really serious in their criticisms. I think that to some degree it's, uh, kind of jealousy that some might hold because of the prominence that the NAACP has in the civil rights field. It might be that sometimes in, uh, caution to try to be sure that the step we take is the right step to take. That, uh, sometimes we're criticized for moving slower than others would have us move. But when we look at the fact that regardless to who else gets in jail, because of whatever activity they have become involved in, it's always the grand old, good NAACP that number one, puts up the bond money to get him out of jail; and number two, furnishes the legal talents to get him out of the difficulty with which 9:00they are involved. So, although there might be criticisms leveled against the NAACP at times by some, I think that these criticisms are in the main expressions that do not come from the heart, but, uh, come from the lips in somewhat passion and, and, uh, are not really aimed at casting a derogatory picture of the NAACP but are more to cast a pleasant picture about an organization for which a man might have, uh, a persuasion for, other than the NAACP.
WARREN: Waiving the question of one organization against another,there is an argument that one encounters to the effect that dependence on legal action, the insistence on the legality of the process has inhibited the achievement of civil rights, because it carries no threat 10:00with it.
HENRY: Oh, no, no, I can't, uh, agree with that at all. I think thatthe mere fact that the NAACP has been involved in legal action, it has served, uh, as an apparatus to determine actually what the law is, what the law says, and a determination and an interpretation of the law that is on the book. Without which there would be no precedent, without which there would be no, uh, direct action knowing previously what the final legal outcome is going to be. Now, I don't mind violating many of the Mississippi statutes, but those that I violate I know are in contrast with what is the law on the federal level. And speaking from a scriptorial point of view, I would not, uh, want to 11:00become involved in violation of the laws of this state that would be upheld by the Constitution of the United States. And I think that the legalistic approach that the NAACP has taken has clarified this for us. Therefore, we can, without hesitation, become involved in direct action, because we know the First Amendment to the Constitution gives us the right to protest, but the good old NAACP has established this right in our own mind, and consequently when we violate this law we are not violating what we consider an actual law, but a practice that is within Mississippi that we want to get rid of.
WARREN: I've heard it argued, too, with the legalistic approach keepsthe image of a law-abiding society as what would come out of the period of protest.
HENRY: Well, and, I think that's important. I think that we do want to12:00become, we do want to be rather law-abiding citizens. And I also think that the, the legal image of this nation that has been identified by the work of NAACP lawyers and others really gives the, gives--brings into the possibility of creation of the direct action movement. Now, were it not for the fact that the Constitution of the United States stands for the equality of mankind so defined, that this country itself was built on acts of protest--the Boston Tea Party and, and various other activities that were, of which were responsible for the birth of this nation. Were it not for the fact that we know that these are democratically sanctioned principles or protests, the image of 13:00this nation in the eyes of the negroes, it's very necessary that we understand that this is the position, this is the official position of our country. Were it that the official position of our country was to deny the right to negroes to be full and free citizens of this country, I doubt very seriously if the protest that we are waging on a nonviolent nature would be continued to be waged in this restrained, dignified manner. Because, uh, without the hope, without the knowing that the United States sanctions what we're doing, then we would be in open rebellion against the country. And therefore, the restraints that we are now able to impose upon those who participate, it would not be possible if the victories that we seek were not so assured. 14:00
WARREN: Do you, uh--first, let me read you two, uh, passagescriticizing, uh, Martin Luther King's philosophy. May I read you this? It's by the, the passage is by Kenneth Clark, the psychologist at CCNY. Here is a quotation: "On the surface, King's philosophy appears to reflect health and stability, while the black nationalists"--he'd been talking about the Black Muslims--"betray pathology and instability. A deeper analysis, however, might reveal that there is also an unrealistic, if not pathological bias, in King's doctrine. The natural reaction to injustice and oppression is bitterness and resentment. 15:00The form which such bitterness takes need not be overtly violent, but the effect on the human spirit remains the same. It would seem, therefore, that any demand that the victims of oppression be required to love those who oppress them places an additional and probably intolerable burden upon these victims." In other words, the notion that it is psychologically unhealthy to, uh, forgive. Now, in the light of, uh, of your own experience, which is vast in this matter, and your observations and readings about the effect of Dr. King's program, what 16:00would you say about this?
HENRY: Dr. King's philosophy is built on an understanding ofChristianity, the Christian ethic. I certainly agree that the adoption of the, the following through on an ethic of Christianity is not, shall we say, common sense. It's, it's not a kind of reaction that one would normally be expected to understand.
WARREN: It's not common human nature either.
HENRY: No, Christianity is not common human nature.
WARREN: It's redeemed human nature, is that it?
HENRY: Yes, redeemed. And it's only in this context that I think that17:00Dr. King's, uh, philosophy, and which is his--the philosophy of many of the others of us, that Jesus Christ so forgave his oppressors, and if we are to be true followers of Christianity, then we too must be able to forgive those that oppress us. But I, I also think that King is very careful in identifying what he calls love. Uh, he refers to the Greek language in an identification of this love. And the three words that the Greeks use: number one, is philial, which is a reciprocal kind of love; one who is loved because he is loved. And it's certainly not love on the philial level that King espouses that we love our oppressors. The other word, another word that the Greeks 18:00use is the word called eros, which in Greek understanding is the yearn of the flesh for the ----------(??). An, an esthetic, syncopating kind of sexual attraction, man for woman. And it is not in this context that King's talking about either. But the third word that the Greeks use is the word called philial. And when we arise to love--the, the third word that he uses is a word called agape--excuse me. And when we rise to love on the agape level, we love men not because we like them, not because they like us, not because there's something physically attractive about them, but we love them because God loves them. Because the Redeemer of this world that we know about caused them to be created and we know that He loves everything He created. Therefore, it is up to us to imitate the leader of the Christian faith, as hard as 19:00it might be, and as difficult as it might be. We know that freedom is not easy. That without, uh, some suffering, there will be no freedom. And I'll go along with King all the way in this redemptive kind of love that espouses a love of mankind because God Himself made him and He loves him.
WARREN: I've heard it said by admirers of, uh, Dr. King say that onlyby this is there basis for a future society. That you can win every lawsuit, every, and by force seize every right, if necessary by force, and then have no society when you got through without this--
WARREN:--human recognition across the lines of race.
HENRY: Well, that might, that's probably true on the American scene. I20:00think this; I think that there has to be this contrast of activity with the emergence to freedom for negroes in America. I don't think that we can win our freedom by using the same apparatuses that are used in, that have been used in Asia and Africa. In, in Ghana and Nigeria, in, uh, other countries of Africa, when the negro has emerged to freedom, he has driven out the white oppressor. And the land has been left to the blacks. But here in America when we gain the freedom that we know we're going to get, our white brother and our black brother are going to be still right here--
HENRY:--neither's going to drive the other out. Therefore, there has tobe this symbiotic kind of response and respect, one for the other.
WARREN: That is, this is not a nationalistic revolution, except inthe Black Muslim's dreams; it is, uh, a matter of a social adjustment 21:00within the same nation, within the same --
HENRY:--I'd say we've got to learn to adjust socially to all otherpeople in this country, and not accept differences as any connotation of superiority or of inferiority, merely a cultural difference.
WARREN: That brings up another question which I--in my coat here--Iencountered first in reading DuBois many years ago, well, many years ago. He speaks of the split or the division in the negro psyche, or the--he says on one hand there is the, uh, yearning that at least some, perhaps many negroes feel--and he was one of them--for identification, uh, with a, uh, black soul, with even, with the spirit of, uh, Africa, 22:00"Mother Africa," or some, uh, pull toward the exclusive experience of being negro. What is now negritude or the "black mystique," those phrases. On the other hand, there's the pull--as he puts it--toward the western cultural tradition, Europe and America. And the impulse to enter that tradition to, uh, integrate with that tradition, and perhaps in the end, uh, to lose the negro identity entirely in, uh, entering the bloodstream and the cultural stream of the, of the western world. For some people this is apparently a problem. A real division of loyalties. Do you think about that or does it seem significant to you? 23:00I know to some people it is not significant at all.
HENRY: Well, it, it's not significant from the standpoint of what willthe outcome be. I take the position that as an American--
WARREN:--I'm sorry, sir. I've ----------(??) a tape problem here.
[Tape 1 ends; tape 2 begins.]
WARREN: Well, you were saying that the split that DuBois , DuBois, uh,refers to, you were explaining your attitude toward that notion.
HENRY: Yes, you asked questions--
HENRY:--to some degree in paraphrasing was the situation where thereis a desire for negroes to retain negroidness and the question of 24:00assimilation into American culture would, uh, inevitably destroy that image. My position is I don't really care which develops. I would like to be considered on par with any other man in America. Uh, to have been born in America, I think to bear some rights that are mine because I was born in my father's house. There are perhaps some rights that others who come over as aliens and become, uh, citizens in that fashion, there probably should be and are some requirements that they 25:00should have to meet. But as an American, as, as a human being born in America, I think that we should be free to associate with whomever we please. If we want to live in a community and it's our desire that, uh, if it's a negro's desire that he perpetuate, uh, as best he can the culture of the African or of the negro, well and good. On the other hand, the American that wants to be a part of the mainstream of American life, and accept his friends because he likes them rather than because of their race. Uh, who perhaps develops in time to come a situation where Americans become tea-colored, I don't think that, uh, 26:00it would cause me to have strong feelings either way.
WARREN: A situation that's similar to that, at least (??) a parallel--and there are many solutions (??) to the other question, too--the Jews I know talk about this division of impulse, uh, either in themselves personally or in this general Jewish situation. Is there a difference between the negro situation in this respect and the Jews, do you think?
HENRY: No, I think that, uh, when we're talking about Jews, maybe wesort of lose the, the fact that many of the present day Jews of my generation are not nearly as great adherers to the Jewish traditions as others. I recall an experience, uh, a year ago. Met a Jewish lad at a convention, and he and I got to be pretty conversant. And at 27:00lunchtime, the hostess brought around ham salad and chicken salad. Well, I just knew that this kid being a Jew would in all probability take chicken salad, so I ordered chicken salad and he ordered ham salad. So I looked at him. I said, "Boy, you can't eat ham; you're a Jew." He said, "Well, I'm just about as good a Jew as you are a Christian." So, and I have found this kind of light banter in, uh, many of the Jews of which I find it possible to be conversant with. And I, I find them just as loosely connected to the orthodoxy of Judaism as, uh; many Americans are religiously I say connected to the preparation 28:00of races. Now, in some negro communities you'll find there will be the women who will not, uh, groom their hair straight, straighten, but will let it grow, uh, in the, its natural form. Well, it's all right if you do, and it's all right, if you don't. And I think that this kind of reaction, or this kind of doing or not doing ought to be put down simply as a cultural trait of a particular individual, and does not connote, not denote anything superior or inferior, but it's just as simple as some people like to wear red ties and others like them black.
WARREN: Where do you think the image of the "New Negro" arose? -----------(??)
HENRY: Well, I think that perhaps Langston Hughes is the author, I29:00think, of a little ditty that gave rise to this stereotyped "new negro" just after the Supreme Court decision of 1954, when he paraphrased an old song by Stephen Foster, "Old Black Joe," and he says, "I'm coming, yes, I'm coming, but my head is bending low. I hear the gentle voices calling, 'Old Black Joe.'" Langston Hughes did it this way. He said, "I'm coming. Yes, I'm coming, but my head isn't standing--my head isn't bending low. I'm walking loud. And I'm talking proud. I'm America's new Black Joe." And that sort of caught on, because it, uh, it's, uh, it's easy to say, it's easy to remember, and it gives you, uh, a sense of buoyancy. And with the '54 Supreme Court decision, I think that the, the somebodyness that, uh, the negro has sort of 30:00acquired of himself.
WARREN: They've had a long preparation though for that, hadn't they,legally and otherwise?
HENRY: Yes, sir. The decision came some seven or eight years, you know,after the legal work had begun. So it was, although it came about in '54 as the decision, this gave, shall we say, authenticity or legality to the dream, the hope that the negro was not biologically, not in any other manner inferior to the white people.
WARREN: A psychologist told me this, uh, some months ago. New Havenis having a community planning program, rebuilding certain sections, rezoning, new housing projects. And in connection with this, they are investigating attitudes of various minority groups in the city. That's 31:00what they want, what image they have of themselves, that such thing. There's a test called a Rumor Test that runs as follows: a picture is shown with four, five persons in it. One, uh, here standing in the foreground being a white man and a negro there, and somebody else there, somebody else there. But a white man is holding a knife in the foreground. Or sometimes a razor. Now, this test is given to a group of whites or a group of negroes. The first person looks at the picture, then the picture is put away. He's supposed to tell number two what's in the picture, then tell number three, and then two tells three, through 10 or 15 people.
HENRY: Yeah, yeah, yeah.
HENRY:--get it all wrong.
WARREN: Get it wrong.
WARREN: The, the person that's holding the knife is one of the negroes.Well, now, this has a, it's a very strange fact, but apparently this 32:00psychologist who knows it, the giving of these tests in New Haven assured me that it's true. What does that mean? [telephone rings]
[Pause in recording.]
HENRY: I think that the stereotype here is perhaps asked, answered injest by Dick Gregory, and of course, I think that Dick has brought, uh, quite a bit of the humor and to some degree the solution to the problem in his banter and humor. Dick said in regard to the fact that, that negroes usually were depicted as carriers of knives, uh, is largely because the white people won't sell us no guns. And it's a sort of 33:00get-even weapon because you can buy a butcher knife at any store to carry home to use, to use in the kitchen. But, I don't know how this image of the negro, uh, has preceded over other nationalities. I see about as many white fellows with knives as, as negroes. Um, I think that in our own community, a negro would come nearer being arrested for bearing a knife than would a white man.
WARREN: Certain that's true.
HENRY: And, um, therefore, we get more publicity about having knivesthan the whites do. Many of the things that a negro gets arrested for, the white man is either chastised and sent home, or nothing is said at 34:00all to him about it.
WARREN: But, in any case, here in New Haven, far away, a significantnumber of negroes have accepted this white man's stereotype of the negro. And put the knife into the negro's hand--
HENRY:--well, yes, I think this is important, too. Mississippi is nota, a mutation in America. The, the bigotry that exists in Mississippi is perhaps more overt than exists in New Haven. But this question of racial prejudice, this question of white supremacy, frankly the question of white supremacy is present throughout the western world in American and European culture. Wherever, uh, western culture is involved, you have a system of white supremacy. Show me a negro in the legislature of England, France, Italy. Wherever you have western 35:00culture, why I don't know, but there is always in accompaniment, an existence of white supremacy.
WARREN: Undoubtedly true. Of course, there are no negroes in England,no significant number, nor Italy.
HENRY: Well, they say that, uh, there are some in Russia, too. And ofcourse I have no, no feeling of kindness toward Communism at all, and I haven't seen Pravda exploiting , uh, espousing the negro cause to the point that you see negroes in the Presidium either.
WARREN: No, no, no, no.
HENRY: See? So, this, this image of white supremacy is not at allconfined to Mississippi. It's nationwide and to some extent worldwide.
WARREN: Do you feel that this thing is true that James Baldwin said, andhas been said by others as well, that the Southern mob--you meet on the 36:00streets of, of Jackson, or Little Rock, or New Orleans, Birmingham-- does not represent the will of the Southern majority?
HENRY: Yes, I, I think that's true. And I think that the, many ofthe people in the South are not permitted because of real or imagined fears to espouse the goodness that they really feel in their hearts. Political opportunism causes the expressions of racial bigotry to the point that many people feel that they can't win an elected position unless they espouse the cause of racial hatred. And when you study the 37:00history of, of, of Eastland and Vardaman and Bilbo, you will find that, uh, in many instances these men sired negro sons or negro children by negro women, which, uh, gives you to understand that they really didn't hate the negro. Or he would have found himself far away from it. But, the question of the fact that negroes are not registered to vote in any appreciable number gives rise to the political necessity of espousing a cause of racial hatred if the politician intends to win at the ballot box. Now, once the negro acquires the right to vote, you're going to have a whole lot of white people talking about how good we were to negroes even back then. And how we felt about negroes even then but 38:00were afraid to say it. Now, I think though that we go back to our, our feelings of Christianity here, and this sort of is unbelievable by the white majority, too, that the negro really holds no vengeance about what happened yesterday. If they will really just begin right now to act right (??), they'd be surprised how fast and how quickly we forgive. But the white man is afraid that his deeds are going to follow him. And he feels that once the negro gets in power, the negro is going to remember all of the dirty deeds that he's gotten from the white community, and therefore he continues to prolong the day as long as he possibly can that, uh, he will have to suffer for his crimes. In other words, this old eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, and a man reaping what he sows. But, if we--when we do get suffrage, get the right to 39:00vote, it is our determination to really show America how democracy can really work. And how the freedoms that we seek for ourselves will be definitely shared with everybody else, because we realize that freedom is a, is a peculiar kind of a commodity. You can only keep it by giving it away. The only way that a man can be free is to express and give freedoms to all of the other people that he comes in contact with. And this is, uh, a general feeling among the leadership of the negro community with whom, with whom, with which I am in contact with. None of us have the, the vengeance and the hatred to carry.
WARREN: This is the general feeling, you say?
HENRY: Yes, sir.
WARREN: You don't think it's confined to, uh, persons approachingmiddle-age or older? It would apply to the young, too?
HENRY: I think it applies very much to the young. I think that, uh, the40:00question of being sure that all people enjoy the rights and privileges of the American citizen is perhaps more imbued in the minds and hearts of the young than in the old.
WARREN: Even when they are not, uh, Christians?
HENRY: Even when they're not Christians. I don't think that it, ittakes a Christian to feel this kind of, of, uh, responsibility. It takes a person to some degree that has experienced difficulty to know what it's all about. Now I think that the greatest ally that the negro gained during his whole crisis was the white enlisted man that served in World War II and in the Korean War. This white man went to the Army never having experienced any kind of segregation or discrimination in 41:00his community. And here he goes into the Army, he finds that the PX system is so arranged that what comes in is placed in the officer's PX, and they get what they want. And then it's sent down to him. And the quarters on the base where the officers live is so much better than the quarters that he lives. And he got to see what segregation and discrimination means. He realized that when it was doled out to him, he didn't like it. And he began to have a greater appreciation for the, the fight that the negro is making, trying to get rid of these same oppressions. And look at the, the broad spectrum of white support that the negro has in his cause for freedom, and you will find a great majority of it comes from veterans of the World War II.
WARREN: Many of whom I've been told had their first chance to know anegro personally in the army.
HENRY: That's true. In the service. They only knew him as a servant,42:00uh, in some servile occupation.
WARREN: Or had never seen one at all (??).
HENRY: I mean they'd never seen him for himself and they only knew themabout what they had read about them, or what they had heard about them, and usually this was in derogatory terms.
WARREN: You're a business man. Uh, what do you find in Mississippi, orin other places you know, of negro anti-Semitism?
HENRY: If this is anti-Semitism, I'd like it to be defined as such.In the fight for human dignity, we have never underestimated our opposition, but we have overestimated our support. We felt that 43:00naturally we would have the Jewish people on our side; we thought naturally we would have labor on our side, because the enemies of all three are usually found in the same group. Here we don't have the Jews supporting us.
WARREN: In Mississippi?
WARREN: But you do elsewhere?
HENRY: Yeah, elsewhere. -----------(??), the president of the NAACPis Jewish.
HENRY: And Kivie Kaplan, one of the most ardent workers in the NAACP isJewish. And it was this image of Jews as we knew them on the national level that caused us to feel that we would, could count on the Jews.
WARREN: In Mississippi.
HENRY: In Mississippi. And, uh, here in, in our hometown, we, we haveabsolutely no support from the Jewish community. Uh, frankly, some of our greatest oppressors are found in the Jewish community, which 44:00saddens me. Which, uh, is a statement that I'm sorry to have to make. And if that anti-Semitism, then we have learned it, uh, reluctantly. We would hope that that would be a fact that we would not learn.
WARREN: But you don't generalize from this, this situation has localroots. That's the assumption that you are making about it.
HENRY: Yes, locally and frankly when we are exposed to a Jewish person,there is this, uh, feeling that he is a friendly person and we accept him as our friend until, and if, uh, he conducts himself in a manner that says that he's not. Frankly, it will never be the negro community that will be responsible for not being able to get along with the Jewish community. 45:00
WARREN: Do you think that the Mississippi Jews, for instance, becauseslightly more vulnerable than Gentiles to social pressure? That's why that they react this way--
HENRY:--I would think so, I would think that they know that once thewhite man clubs or clobbers the negro into submission, that he's probably next. And it's, uh, to his advantage not to have become involved in the problems of other oppressed people. But, uh, it would be hard for me not to become involved in the problems of a person who was being oppressed, uh, without regard to what his race might happen to be.
WARREN: But of course we know in general the Jews have been, uh, verygreat supporters for the civil rights movement and for the negro in particular.
HENRY: Yes, and that's why I say it was, uh, a question of46:00overestimating our support--
HENRY:--here in Mississippi because we assumed, without asking, thatcertainly we can count on the Jews. But, uh, that has not been the case morally, financially, or any other way.
WARREN: Do you notice any difference in attitudes of white people ingeneral, say, under thirty and over-thirty. Is the younger generation changing its attitude on the race question?
HENRY: I'm sorry, I, I can't. That's a thing that I would like tobelieve. But when I observed the riot at the University of Mississippi last year, and observed boys who had fuzz under their chins, who had never begun to shave. And girls who still wore too much lipstick, not 47:00knowing how to really be well-groomed--in other words, kids between fourteen- eighteen-years-old. And realizing that, that these kids from the day that they were born, many of them had heard only that the Supreme Court decision of 1954 was not the law of the land. It need not be obeyed. And this had been drummed into the minds and the hearts of these kids from their formative years. And the average kid that's in college now was between fifteen and seventeen when the Supreme Court decision of '54 was passed. And all they've heard since then was they didn't have to obey it. And here they're facing on their own college campus with the presence of the negro, uh, which goes against all they 48:00have been taught. And there they begin to throw the bottles and the bricks and the racial epithets and the curses, which said to a lot of people that the sociological and the psychological utterance that we had taken too long to be a truism--that the younger generation will straighten this thing out, if only given a chance--uh, did not follow the lines of the writer.
WARREN: Depressing thought.
HENRY: Yeah, it is a depressing thought, but I think we have to--I haveto express it as I have seen it.
WARREN: Sure, sure.
HENRY: As much as I would like to say that certainly we can count on theyounger white to be much more tolerant than the older white. But when 49:00you realize that the greater amount of the violence--the, the bricks that are thrown, the people who are knocked off stools in sit-ins, the kids that bombed our house between nineteen and twenty-two.
WARREN: You identified them, did you?
HENRY: No, I did not identify them. They were captured--
HENRY:--the same night.
HENRY: And, uh, we understand that each one had between five hundred,had about five hundred dollars in his pocket.
WARREN: Paid to do it?
HENRY: We think so, when they captured them.
WARREN: Otherwise, where would they have got it?
HENRY: Yes, a kid that young. But still, that is the, that image ofyouth, uh, expression, expressing and acting in a method of racial intolerance says to me that, uh, we're not home safe even with the youth.
WARREN: I've heard it said that it will take, that the riots set50:00development back here ten years. These people who, uh, the whole generation in college that now run Mississippi with this in their ears (??).
HENRY: The riot?
WARREN: The riot and the, and the attitudes that made the riot.
HENRY: They say it set it back?
HENRY: I don't think that at all. I think that the riot has reallypropelled us into what can become a new era. I said that because prior to the riot our contact with the campus of University of Mississippi was next to nothing.
HENRY: Since the riot, almost weekly, sometimes daily, there arestudents and faculty persons who come by just to exchange ideas and views on particular issues. These students and faculty members would 51:00not have dared be seen in the company of the president of the NAACP prior to the riots. Practically (??), the riots actually freed them.
WARREN: Well, that would seem to prove that there's, uh, something said,to be said for the younger generation then.
HENRY: Well, I, except that, uh, many of the people who take thisopportunity are not necessarily young people.
WARREN: I see, I see.
HENRY: Many of, it's a mixture of old and young.
WARREN: I see. But some young.
HENRY: Some young and some old, yes.
WARREN: Yes. How much contact, uh, in terms of civil rights movementdo you find between, uh, the more prosperous middle-class, as it were, upper-class negroes, and the masses of the negroes. Is there more communication now in recent years than there was or less?
HENRY: There's more. And I think that the reason that there is more is52:00because of the involvement of the younger negroes, the teenagers who are the sons and daughters of this older, middle-class black bourgeois, uh, negro. And once momma's red-haired boy is in jail and has been slapped around by the police, regardless of what he's there for, uh, she becomes enraged and becomes more amenable to the civil rights struggle than before.
HENRY: And one thing that the white policeman have not been able to do,they have not been able to differentiate between the child of the negro lady that has set the image of stereotype in a community and the negro that is now striving, making the strive for freedom. And because of 53:00that non-distinction, the negroes now take the position from another cliche that, uh, if we hadn't been in a bed together, we wouldn't be in this jam today. Which says that we're all negroes, we're, we were involved in the same strawberry patch, and we're in the same jar of jam. So, therefore, we might as well act like it and try to work together to get out of it.
WARREN: It's unified the negro group. It's made a group identitypossible that was not there before.
HENRY: Yes, sir, it has. The, the overt activities of the whitecommunity has done more to unite the negro community than any other thing.
WARREN: That leads me to another notion. There's--where does leadershipcome from? What social, uh, bracket?
HENRY: It's, it's not indigenous to any strata.54:00
WARREN: It's not.
HENRY: You'll find, uh, the leadership personnel will range from personswho can't read or write to people with PhD's.
HENRY: And the person who can't read and write will have just as muchpersuasion over the group that he is involved with.
WARREN: Natural force and natural intelligence.
HENRY: Yes, sir.
WARREN: But there's no real danger then of a, of a break betweenleadership and, and the, uh, masses?
HENRY: No, sir. I don't think so at all. I think that the--
WARREN:--the fear is sometimes expressed, of course. This is said to beat least problem, if not a danger.
HENRY: Well, what really happens is, the leadership finds out which way55:00the mass wants to go, or what the mass want to do, and then go get in front and lead it. But, um, the fellow who lives on the plantation who digs the ditch, who makes a dollar a day, and sometimes nothing, is just as much concerned and many times more concerned with becoming free than the man who is maybe a little better off. And the identity of all of us with this particular struggle, regardless to strata, uh, I don't under--I don't know just how it happens, except that, take a minister in a pulpit. He is no more a leader to the PhD than he is to the little child in catechism; each one follows him, you know. So, I, 56:00I think too that the position of the church in negro life where we have this democratic kind of society, uh, has had and will have in the future great bearing on the surgance towards freedom of the negro community.
WARREN: What church do you belong to?
HENRY: I'm Methodist.
HENRY: Yes. And we're moving too slow. We've got segregation withinthe Methodist church that we've got to get rid of. Uh, the, as you know, in the Methodist church the jurisdictional system prevails. All negro churches, wherever they are in America, are certified to the central jurisdiction, while there are other four geographical jurisdictions in to which the white churches fall. And we are working hard within the Methodist church to rid it of the jurisdictional 57:00system, and thus get away with segregation within the church.
WARREN: Are you making headway?
HENRY: Yes, uh, we have come to the point where there, there is muchdiscussion. This will be one of the main topics that'll be discussed at the annual convention this year. And there has been some relaxing of the barriers, wherein if a church wants to leave a conference and the conference to which it wants to go will accept it, uh, a vote, a majority vote by each will affect the move. But it's going to have to be relaxed much more than that, especially going into geographical division, and that's what we are contending for.
WARREN: Are you finding any significant support from white Southernersin this?
HENRY: Yes, uh, the white South, the white ministers--well, the white58:00ministers with which I'm in contact, and that would be largely those that are concerned with the division of Christian social concern within the Methodist church, of, uh, which I find myself fairly often in their presence--are quite concerned about ridding the church of the jurisdictional system. Thus, giving them a church doctrine, or a, a legality to preach the brotherhood of God--the brotherhood of man and the fatherhood of God. Right now, as long as we've got the jurisdictional system, this says to the white congregations in the South that the church condones this segregation. And once we rid the church of this tailor-made excuse, then we can begin to make progress without the law saying that this is the church's position.
WARREN: Yes, I see the relevance of that jurisdictional rearrangement.59:00
WARREN: It's sometimes said, and I have a quotation here from a negro,uh, sociologist and historian to this effect: "The negro's plight in the South will be lightened substantially only when the plight of the poor white is lightened when these two can no longer be pitted against each other in hatred and contempt."
HENRY: I think that's pretty, pretty much a true statement. I thinkthat, that the power structure of, of--and I can speak about Mississippi because I know it best--the power structure of Mississippi for too long has manipulated the negro against the poor white and the poor white against the negro. It is told to the negro every time there's a crime committed by a white men against a negro, that, uh, that was 60:00a redneck that did it. 'It wasn't us,' up to big white people, 'Oh no, we don't do that; it's the rednecks.' And they have told the, the white, illiterate, poor man that every crime, particularly a sex crime, is committed by a negro upon a white woman, that it was a negro that did it. And of course they do this because sex is the thing, that, uh, the, the, uh, most limited mind can comprehend. And that's the scarecrow that they use. 'You've get to keep these negroes in their place, or they're going to take all your women.' Now, to me that's a serious really, a serious indictment, uh, on the part of the white male to, towards his white woman. To feel that the only thing that is keeping her from embracing every negro she sees is because the white 61:00man keeps his foot on the negro's neck. Frankly, if I were a white woman, I would be, uh, completely insulted by this line of reasoning. And this thing about, uh, negro men seeking insatiably the association of white women, now most negro men that I know wish to God that our white brothers were satisfied with their own woman as we are with ours. You can hardly come into any negro neighborhood at night without seeing some car with a white man circling, trying to find some negro lady to have pleasure with. Well, now, I think this position is if, uh, she wants him and he wants her, that's two people's business.
WARREN: It's a private affair.
HENRY: A private affair. They want to, uh, get married, that's theirown private affair. I take quite a dim view on the, the legality of my state that, that, uh, negates the possibility of holy matrimony between 62:00the races. But there's nothing about adultery and fornication. And they use these types of expressions about the negro to the white and about the white to the negro that keeps us apart. Now, I think that the best thing in the world that could happen to Mississippi would be somewhat a wedding (??) of the negro and the poor whites. A populist movement that would break the stranglehold that the power structure of the white community now holds over both the negro and the poor white. And there are only two divisions between the poor folks in our state; there's the poor white folks and poor colored folks. And I think the sooner we realize that, the better off each of us are going to be.
WARREN: Do you see any immediate prospect for the economic competitionbetween the competition of jobs, between, uh, the negro laborer and 63:00the, uh, poor white laborer, or even a little, a higher level?
HENRY: Yes, I--
WARREN:--for the struggle for economic advantage in a state which ispoor, doesn't have enough jobs to go around.
HENRY: I think this, I think that the pay scale that is now used asa threat to everybody is a prostitution of the labors of the white people, in that the white employer says to the white worker that, 'If you don't agree to work for this dollar and a quarter an hour, I'm going to hire a nigger for seventy-five cents.' And the attitude is not to get the best for the whites of our community by the power structure. 64:00The power structure is only content to be sure that what the white man gets is better than what the negro gets. Not that he is aiming at ultimacy for either group. I think that when employment is based on ability, without regard to race, creed or color, that this in itself will create a situation where industrial personnel will be willing to come into our area, and with it will bring additional jobs and will perhaps create many more jobs than there are now.
WARREN: That's the race situation has prevented the industrialization bybringing the new, new, uh, plants?
HENRY: That's, that's my feeling; that's my feeling, sir. And I think65:00that when we break this thing stranglehold on race that there will be many more jobs than (??) perhaps enough jobs to go around.
WARREN: Is it noticeable in Mississippi that some, uh, negro businessmenand some others, uh, who have, uh, more or less privileged positions actually oppose the civil rights movement? This is true in some localities.
HENRY: You know, I don't see how. If a negro, if a negro say he opposedthe Civil Rights Bill, there are either two things present: he's either a liar or he's a fool. He might say that he opposed the Civil Rights Bill because he is speaking the language that someone who can do him a favor would want to hear. And he enhances himself possibly, limitedly in his estimation. But to be against the Civil Rights Bill is to be 66:00against yourself. And it's hardly inconceivable that a, a rational, truthful man could take a position against the Civil Rights Bill.
WARREN: Well, now, in a St. Louis paper, the president of, of a negrobusiness association wrote an article, saying that integration would set back negro business in St. Louis by a generation.
HENRY: Well, I presume what he was getting at was that the negrobusinessman in St. Louis does not run, uh, his business in competition with the American market. I think it's, it's no good to be the best negro businessman; I think you've got to aim at being the best businessman in the town in order to gain the clientele that is out there. 67:00
WARREN: That is the open competition in the long run would benefit thenegro.
HENRY: Yes, sirree, I do believe it.
WARREN: And the short sight is trying to protect (??).
HENRY: Yes, and of course, you know, negroes too have vested interestsin segregation, many.
WARREN: That's what I'm talking about now. -----------(??)
HENRY: But, I think that, uh, that is not best, that is not good for thedevelopment of the group. Now, you know back during the early days of labor, when there was this cry about labor being Communist, there was one classical cliche where you could hear expressed, uh, when a person was looking for advantages and working with the labor movement to gain them. "Baby, this ain't for Moscow; this is for me." And many of the negro people who feel that they are not capable of competing on the open market will perhaps take this position that this is for me. And 68:00go at it from a subjective point of view. But objectivity ultimately is going to prevail. And those of us who can't compete on the open market are going to have to get out.
WARREN: There're always casualties.
HENRY: Yes, sir. In any sociological change, there're going to becasualties. In the American way, the person who builds the best mousetrap is going to get the business. And I think that negro people have got to be prepared to take their chances on the open market and conduct their businesses as a business should be conducted and not rely upon any advantage that race might give them.
WARREN: This is a problem, though, isn't it for many people? For some69:00people, anyway.
HENRY: It's a problem for some people but I think that, that when raceis removed though, it will not be a problem.
WARREN: You mean it's, it's a fear.
HENRY: Yes, I think it's--
WARREN:--it's not justified--
HENRY:--I think so. You know some people see ----------(??).
HENRY: Yes, yes.
WARREN: What did you think about the verdict in the Byron de la Beckwithtrial?
HENRY: Well, I'm pretty much a skeptic, I guess, but I accept theverdict in the Byron de la Beckwith trial as the second act of a well-written drama with the actors playing their parts superbly. I think that the, the decision of a hung jury was made before the trial started. I think that the third act of the drama will show Beckwith 70:00a free man. The first act was the preliminary than went in (??) the selection of the jury. I think--
WARREN:--do you mind explaining that?
HENRY: The selection of the jury was a tedious, uh, on the surface kindof a reaction. Mr. Waller, uh, took a lot of time, so did Mr. Lott, Mr. Cunningham in securing twelve members of the jury. I think that it could have been done in five minutes and been over with.
WARREN: It's never that way though.
HENRY: (laughs) Well, no, it's, it's never that way, but I'm saying thatthe, the stage that has been set for the Byron de la Beckwith trial that attempts to erase some of the mud from the name of Mississippi, at least we got a hung jury. Uh, and to my mind all the time they took 71:00selecting the jury was a part of the act. And I think that, uh, when the trial is finally over, perhaps someday like Milam and Bryant, who wrote a, gave a Look magazine, uh, uh, a close-up survey of what had happened--
WARREN:--in the Till case?
HENRY: In the Till case. That, uh, maybe the Saturday Evening Postwill print Byron de la Beckwith's confessions. And how there was this maneuvering back and forth.
WARREN: Do you go as far as to believe, as some say, that even the taxidrivers who, uh, gave testimony that was damaging to de la Beckwith were giving fabricated testimony as to round out the drama, to give 72:00interest to the drama?
HENRY: Well, I don't know. I, I think that, that the jurors, that,that's the question that, that's the position that, uh, I, I feel most strongly about. Uh, that the, the, the time that they took for the verdict, the, the hung jury question, and, uh--there never has been a white man in Mississippi given a penalty in a capital crime for a crime against a negro. And there have been situations perhaps where the web of guilt was wound much tighter. In the Till case, there was positive identification; 'You are the man.'
WARREN: In the Melton case, there was positive identification too.73:00
HENRY: Yes, 'you are the man.' Yes.
WARREN: An eyewitness.
HENRY: Who, who pulled the trigger. In the service station--
WARREN:--eye witness in the Melton case.
HENRY: In the service station, that's right.
WARREN: Because I was in Glendora just after that. I saw the widow andI talked to people around town. Nobody in town wasn't certain; totally convinced of the guilt. Of what's his name? Who shot, who shot, uh, William Melton?
HENRY: Well, uh, Merlow (??) was with the man who shot him. I don'trecall just who pulled the trigger.
WARREN: Oh, it's Kimbell.
HENRY: Kimbell, yes, Kimbell.
WARREN: Kimbell. K-i-m-b-e-l-l. Kimbell shot him. And was acquittedon the first ballot, I think.
WARREN: Now, the Clarksdale paper, if I remember correctly--and pleasecorrect me if this is not.
WARREN: I seem to remember that the Clarksdale paper, after theacquittal of Kimbell, published on the front page a little editorial saying in the Till case there might have been some excuse for failure to convict. In this case there is none.
HENRY: That's true.
WARREN: We have flunked it.
HENRY: That's right.
WARREN: Now, that's, was that a courageous act for that editor of thislocal paper to come out and-- 74:00
HENRY:--I think it was a courageous act. However, I think it reflectsthe thinking of a man that's no longer with the paper now, a boy (??) by the name of Guy Clark, who actually served as the advertisement manager but he was the liberal force in the Clarksdale Press Register. I don't think you will find, uh, an editorial of that nature today.
WARREN: What became of him?
HENRY: He died. Died of a heart attack.
WARREN: How old was he?
HENRY: Well, Guy must be, must have been around forty-five when hedied. He was an heir of the founders of the city. Um, almost a real liberal. A very good man.
WARREN: A man who, uh, because of his social position felt free toexpress his, his views.
HENRY: His views, sure. And he had taken, he'd been expressive allalong, so it was nothing unusual about it.
WARREN: Do you find that kind of maverick very often? The man ofprivileged position?
HENRY: Not very often.75:00
WARREN: Use his privilege for independence?
HENRY: Not very often. The fear of social ostracism and the fear of,of uh, being called a nigger-lover, and mostly the fear of the children being tagged, 'Your daddy is a nigger-lover.'
WARREN: That pressure.
HENRY: That type of pressure keeps many people from being the kind ofgood man at heart that they are.
WARREN: (pause) This is cutting back into history, but I'd like to askyou this one. Uh, Myrdal gives up what he would consider the rational program for the reconstruction of the South in 1865.
HENRY: Is this from The American Dilemma?
WARREN: Yes. You remember the passage, uh, the passage from the--he76:00says that there should have been compensation for slaves to the now ex-owners. They should've given him expropriation of land for the resettlement and division of land. This land should've been paid for at a reasonable rate to the owners from whom it was expropriated. That the negroes who received the land, uh, should have been charged something for it over a long period of time, and receive supervision and control of the best selling of it for a certain number of years, until they had adapted themselves to the new system. Does this make sense? Because we're looking back on impossibilities.
HENRY: Well, yes. Uh, I'd like to answer it my way.
WARREN: Please do, please do. I just started this as a line ofdiscussion.
HENRY: Yes, yes. I take the position that if the white community had77:00accorded my grandma and my grandpa at the time they were freed from slavery, recognition for the labor that they had given free, that they could have lived like millionaires forever, because of this exploitation. I do not feel that--and I'm sure you will recognize, too--the Civil--the, the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation did not free the slaves. The slaves had already been freed by this, the, the--well, the, when Lincoln told -- Lincoln said, "If you drive the Confederates back from Antietam Creek, I'll free the slaves." And, of course, they were driven back. The signing of the, the Emancipation 78:00rather than the winning of the Civil War did not free the slaves. And, of course, that was somewhat an ambivalent position, because here the slaves are freed after the War. There, the big thing that was wrong with the way the slaves were freed was none of us possessed the land. And I'd like to go back to perhaps--the--the Christian, the church would perhaps not agree with this maybe--but in the, the, the leading of the children from, from Israel into what we called the Promised Land, uh, to my way of thinking, was that Moses promised the children land, if you follow me. And, of course, from the land comes all things that are conducive to life. And there was no place called the Promised 79:00Land as an area, but it was simply that they were promised land. And the analogy that I'm drawing is that after the Civil War, the negro slaves were not even promised land. The Russians, when they freed their slaves, there was this land reform. Uh, England, when it freed its slaves, there was this land reform activity. And the American negro was the only group that were freed from slavery during--you know, during this particular era, several countries freed their slaves during this, this general area [era]. And the American negro was the only group that was freed from slavery with no possession whatsoever. And because of this situation, the, uh, progress of the American negro has been slower than the negroes in other communities. I have seen 80:00the plantation system grow. We have studied the growth of, of some plantations. And we have seen that as negroes began to buy and acquire land after the Civil War, that it was not too long before the man who owned the land in the first place had connived, he had connived and somehow secured all of the land generally back. And the negro reverted from a slave to a tenant farmer or to a sharecropper. And his lot has not been that much better off. And I, I as far as right now--1964--that we give serious thought to a land reform program in the South. And if you look at the way these mass plantations have, have come into being. 81:00How it has been conniving between circuit and ----------(??) clerks. There were negroes probably have been taken for taxes, where negroes have been charged smaller amounts for taxes than should have been charged over the years. And they take the position that it's the, the owner of the land's responsibility to be sure that he's properly taxed. And after some fifty or sixty years, this great tax debt comes against the land and the negro can't pay it. And the land is confiscated.
WARREN: Is that fairly common?
HENRY: It's fairly common in the growth of the large plantations in thisarea--
WARREN:--I see, yes, yes--
HENRY:--in the South. So although it appears to be in advocating landreform, taking from to give to others, but when we look at how come those that got, got, and those that do not have, have not got, it, it doesn't disturb my, uh, conscience morality at all to advocate that 82:00we're becoming seriously considerators of a land-reform program.
WARREN: But on a program with compensation or--
HENRY: With compensation.
WARREN: With compensation.
HENRY: With compensation, yes.
WARREN: You would've been for compensation, uh, to the Southernlandholders in '65?
HENRY: I don't really know.
WARREN: Well, that's the big--, that's Myrdal's big point, of course.
HENRY: Yeah, I don't really know. When, when I, uh, understand theamount of, of human labor for free that these plantation owners used, I, I don't really know whether they were entitled to anything else. Maybe at that time they actually had received more than they, uh, really should have.
WARREN: Myrdal's point is that there was a bankrupt economy. And toleave it bankrupt as it was, in fact, was a contributing, uh, element to the present situation. 83:00
HENRY: I think the big mistake we really made was removing the Northerntroops too soon. I think that, uh, I believe it was Rutherford Hayes, wasn't it?
WARREN: That's right.
HENRY: That, uh, made what we feel was a deal with the South, "If you'llvote for me, I'll remove the federal troops."
WARREN: The big sellout of 1876.
HENRY: Yes. And, uh, I think more than compensation for the land, uh,the big error was the, the uh, premature removal of the troops.
WARREN: Uh, eleven years after the war was over.
WARREN: (pause) I hear now and then--particularly in Mississippi--the,uh, notion that only by some sort of threat of violence will real 84:00progress take place toward social justice for the negro.
HENRY: Well, that all depends on what you mean by threat of violence.You see, any act--
WARREN:--let's explore that then--
HENRY:--that the negro takes toward gaining his rights as a citizen isconsidered a threat of violence by the white community. Uh, if it's going into a church and espousing the question of the right to vote in some communities, that provokes the white community to violence. If it's printing a handbill and passing it out in some communities, that's a threat to the tranquility and peace and a threat to violence to the particular community. So, uh, you, this is, you would have to define, you know, exactly what is a threat to violence, and whether or not 85:00action guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States, the, the, the, uh, First Amendment that gives us the right of freedom of assembly and freedom of expression or can be construed as threats of violence.
WARREN: Yes, I, I realize that. I was going a step farther. But I mustchange the tape first.
HENRY: You mean we've been here an hour?
WARREN: I don't want to keep you up all night now. It's almost eleveno'clock. Let's, let me just' take a little piece of the next tape, is that all right?
WARREN: Just a little piece. This is going too well; I hate to stop it.
[Tape 2 ends; tape 3 begins.]
HENRY:--the white community. I don't enjoy, uh, going down the streetand hearing "There goes that son-of-a-bitch," you know. I, I don't enjoy that. But, uh, I believe that, that trying to be free, if, if 86:00that's a part of the process, then if there's to be trouble in my day, let it happen, so that after this is through then maybe things will be better.
WARREN: I asked you before, but the tape wasn't on, how your wife hasstood up under this.
WARREN: Will you answer it again for me on the tape?
HENRY: Um-hm. You ready?
HENRY: Well, Mrs. Henry has stood this, uh, turmoil and difficultyremarkably well. And frankly, without her encouragement and, and support and understanding, it would be impossible for me to carry on. Because I'm away from home really too much, more than any married man likes to be away from home. The telephone calls, um, come almost 87:00on the hour every day about, uh, some kind of violence or vulgarities and obscenities, which no man would really want his wife to have to undergo and put up with. But the, the fact that she's able to ask questions, like, uh, "Certainly you must be Christian and you wouldn't do that." Uh, when Rebecca, our daughter, answers the phone and the man says, "Yeah, I just shot your daddy," she just look, look at the phone and say, "Aw, fellow, you kidding." Uh, these kinds of expressions on the part of my family are really sustaining to me. And I'm grateful for it and I don't know whether I would be able to continue in this activity were it not for the fact that I have the complete support, understanding and, and love of my family.
WARREN: You have friends who come in to keep watch on the house atnight, don't you? 88:00
HENRY: Yes, we, uh, started this after Medgar was killed.
HENRY: And there has been this encouragement from all over the nationthat, uh, we do take some precautions. And because of the, because the psychological well-being and psychological satisfaction of my family is important to me in trying to continue in the field of civil rights, we have permitted our, our friends to come in every night, and there's someone in the house or around the house every night since the death of Medgar.
WARREN: Are they armed?
HENRY: They're armed, yes, sir.
WARREN: But since that time there's been no further, uh, trouble with,with at your house?
HENRY: No, and I suppose to some degree it's due to the fact that afterMedgar was killed, I went to the chief of police, and, um, revealed to 89:00him the source of information that I had about, uh, the threats that had been made against my life.
HENRY: And, of course, he told me that, uh, he'd heard several threats,too. And that, uh, heasked me if I wouldn't let him take out an insurance policy on me. Uh, you see, he and I have been involved in, in, uh,, a, a libel difficulty. I--at one time, I was arrested on a morals charge.
WARREN: Here in Clarksdale?
HENRY: No, in, in an adjoining county.
HENRY: Uh, which the chief of police of my city and the countyprosecuting attorney of my county were the only interrogators. And, uh, I felt that they had had a part in, uh, concocting this fabrication, and I told them so. And they reacted by filing a libel suit against me. And the reason that Pearson--that, uh, Collins, the 90:00chief of police, was asking for this life insurance policy was in the event that he won the suit, he wanted to be able to collect his money. And, of course, I parried it as if I thought he was kidding. (Warren laughs) And then the next couple of days, uh, he sent an insurance agent over to the store to try to persuade me to let him take out this policy. And if I had submitted to it, I knew that I'd probably been dead the next day, because here there would have been no reason for somebody not bumping me off with the chief of police ----------(??) to collect whatever, uh, policy he'd been able to write.
WARREN: That's asking for it.
HENRY: Well, yes. (laughs) So, I discussed with him the hiring of aguard, I asked him about the city police department supplying us with protection. And he told me that he didn't have the men to spare and he couldn't do it. So, we hired a guard, and the next couple of nights 91:00he came down to the house, and then arrested my guard and took my gun. And, uh--
WARREN:--the chief of police of Clarksdale?
HENRY: Of Clarksdale, yes. But, uh, that only set off a furor in thecommunity, and many people donated us now more guns than we've ever had before. And, uh, of course, there had been no more confiscations of the weapons that we use, but every person that serves as guard of the house now is armed. And he can come and take the gun whenever he get ready. There'll be plenty more that will be available to us.
WARREN: There's no legal, uh, basis for seizing these weapons?
HENRY: Well, he used the, the question of an unauthorized weapon. Now,I understand that from my lawyers that the state does provide that a weapon in your possession, uh, must be registered with the authorities. 92:00Of course, um, hardly anybody complies with that.
WARREN: Does that apply to shotguns and sporting rifles, too?
HENRY: Well, it does not differentiate. It does not say. It justsimply says that firearms must be registered. And the gun that he took was not so registered. Therefore, we did not, um, become involved in litigations about it.
WARREN: What hour of the night does the guard come on?
HENRY: He comes on around eleven, somewhere in that area, and he's hereall night long. Sometimes--it, it all depends on who's coming. Many of them come much earlier and, uh, spend the evening looking at TV, or some of them come before I get here in the evening and go to bed and take a nap.
WARREN: Then get up when you come in?
HENRY: Then get up, get up when I'm ready to go to bed.
WARREN: This is a body of friends then, who simply take on this duty,93:00then?
HENRY: Yes, sir.
WARREN: Is that generally known in the community and around thecountryside?
HENRY: Well, it's pretty well known in this community. Now, particularlysince, uh, Mr. Collins came out and arrested one of them one day.
WARREN: Yes, yes.
HENRY: That got the word around.
WARREN: That was a hired guard you said, the first one, is that right?
HENRY: Well, uh, he wasn't hired; he was volunteer.
WARREN: Oh, a volunteer too? I thought you said the first guard washired. I hear varying interpretations of the board of registration matter. Some people say there's real apathy. Real, um, just fatalism. Some say there's a certain amount of, uh, fear. And the other interpretations. What is the real--uh, in your mind, the problem? 94:00
HENRY: Well, the, the greatest cause of negroes not registering I thinkcan be analyzed by the Mississippi Civil Rights Committee's report of two years ago, when it gave as the greatest cause that negroes don't go down to register is because of fear of failure of the examination that is to be taken.
WARREN: That fear, not fear of reprisal?
HENRY: That's the first cause.
HENRY: The second cause was fear of reprisals.
HENRY: But the greatest cause was that they were afraid that theycouldn't pass it. And the other causes were direct, uh, intimidation 95:00and the refusal of the clerks to permit them to take the test. If the failure and the fear of failure of this examination is the greatest deterrent to negroes or any people trying to register, it ought to be removed whether the fear is real or imaginary.
HENRY: There should be no existence of fear to that extent in thiscountry that remains without, uh, something being done to, by the state authorities or by the federal government to ensure the people that this fear need not exist.
WARREN: Changing the subject again, I have a quote here, which I'llparaphrase without reading the whole thing to you, um, from a negro 96:00sociologist/historian Dr. Hancock. He says, in brief, the problem of color, the problem of race is a social problem, and therefore is subject to the same considerations of adjustment and maladjustment that all problems of social change involve. In social change--he goes on to say--there is never an immediate solution and never an absolute solution. Now--
HENRY:--I, I think that there will--yes--I think--
WARREN: ----------(??) objecting now--
HENRY:--yes. I think there are imperfections in democracy, and Idoubt if we will ever gain true perfection in democracy, but it can be improved a hell of a lot from where it is now.
WARREN: All right, let's agree with that. He, uh, my question, then,next thing would be this: if, uh, this is a process that is never 97:00immediate, you see. There's no immediate solution. There's always a question of, of adjustments in time, whether a long time or a short time but in time.
WARREN: Therefore put against that the notion of "Freedom Now," whichsays out of time, immediately, on a single stroke. Absolution now--it seems to say that--what does it really say? How do you interpret it?
HENRY: Well, I interpret it this way: the, the freedoms that negroeshave been seeking go back to the year of 1865, 1863. And we have been patient, we have, uh, tried to take into consideration that this will not be an overnight accomplishment, but we think that after a hundred years of trying, it's time for freedom now. We don't think that this is any abrupt, uh, request.
WARREN: Well now, assuming that, uh, it is overdue, assuming that it is98:00time, the time has come and past, past due--
WARREN:--the social process still remains. So, uh, it was not, uh,suppose every legal bar were removed tomorrow morning automatically.
WARREN: The big Civil Rights Bill passed with teeth.
WARREN: All the legal restrictions removed. The process would not becomplete.
WARREN:--what becomes of "Freedom Now" in this situation?
HENRY: Well, you see, the law will not make you love me, but it'll stopyou from lynching me.
HENRY: And that's what we've got to be concerned with about the law.The law itself is one of the greatest force in social change that we can possibly have. And I think that my white brother owes me a deep debt of gratitude when I permit him to give me my rights piecemeal. Now they're, they're mine now, he's lucky that I don't grab them all 99:00right now. When I work for you for ten dollars a week, Saturday come I want my ten dollars. Don't come talking about I' got two now and eight later. And I, I think that's what the struggle and the cry for "Freedom Now" is all about. We'll been in labor nearly four hundred years and we want our payday. That's it.
WARREN: Now, uh, let me say something to you that someone said to methe other day. That so long as there's substantial movement toward freedom, the now is in the concept of freedom as, as due. The process is in the implementation of this idea, hitting it out in time, but in a time that is, that is, uh, they--what is actually, what it promises, it is positive and continuous and accelerated. 100:00
HENRY: I, I can buy that. I can buy that we're going to continue toapply whatever pressures we know how to apply, as long as there is the need to continue to apply them--
HENRY:--the NAACP and other civil rights organizations would like tohave gone out of business yesterday, but we will be in business as long as it takes and as long as it's necessary. We aren't going to come to the point where we're going to, uh, become violent, we're going to try to overthrow the government, we're going to try to gain the freedoms that we know are ours, uh, and thrust, uh, the country, the image of the country in the eyes of the world into a state of degradation from which perhaps it will never, you know, recover from.
WARREN: Yes, yes.
HENRY: But when it comes to the question of slow down, you're going too101:00fast--
WARREN: Seven, eight, nine, ten; seven, eight, nine, ten.
HENRY:--uh, let's try this and not this. The day will never come againwhen there will be any quietus put on the freedom movement.
WARREN: In other words, the "Freedom Now" means, uh, "now" isinterpreted literally, as constant, enervating effort--
WARREN:--and no, no naive belief that a stroke of a pen or a stroke of alaw, uh, brings a mystic change tomorrow morning.
HENRY: That's true.
WARREN: But in terms of the continuing, accelerated effort.
HENRY: Yes, sir.
[Tape 3 ends.]
[End of interview.]